这个有没有可能，大神请评论

希望宇宙大爆炸的支持者和反对者都来挑挑论文的毛病，上面网址可以下载PDF文件

本论文投稿拒信内容Scientific Editor's Comments:EditorComments to the Author:This paper re-visits the idea of 'tired light', in this case due to Compton scattering, as the sources of the observed accelerated expansion of the Universe. While the idea of Compton scattering being a missing effect which may account for the currently observed discrepancy between low and high-redshift measurements of the Hubble parameter is interesting, the paper aims to replace any observed exponential expansion, indeed any expansion, with a static model and Compton scattering. The proposed model claims to account for some of the previous problems with Tired Light models. However, the status of the current Standard Model of Cosmology does not only rely only upon the expansion history, but a wide set of observations - BBN, galaxy distributions, the CMB, gravitational lensing, supernova, etc - which are all tied together in a consistent way through the model. While the paper proposes a neat argument which produces an effective exponential redshift it would only account for one observation, light from supernova, without addressing all the other successes of the Standard Model. Given this, the paper is not suitable for publication by MNRAS and should be Rejected.
Date Sent: 05-Oct-2021【图片】