Even so, evidence from laboratory experiments, polls and consumer reports indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that many people miss and, more importantly, prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way. In turn, such navigational difficulties may subtly inhibit reading comprehension. Compared with paper, screens may also drain more of our mental resources while we are reading and make it a little harder to remember what we read when we are done. A parallel line of research focuses on people's attitudes toward different kinds of media. Whether they realize it or not, many people approach computers and tablets with a state of mind less conducive to learning than the one they bring to paper.
瘦瘦de加菲吧 关注：11贴子：678
- 5回复贴，共1页
▼Objective: To explore effects of the technological interface on reading comprehension in a Norwegian school context. Participants: 72 tenth graders from two different primary schools in Norway. Method: The students were randomized into two groups, where the first group read two texts (1400-2000 words) in print, and the other group read the same texts as PDF on a computer screen. In addition pretests in reading comprehension, word reading and vocabulary were administered. A multiple regression analysis was carried out to investigate to what extent reading modality would influence the students' scores on the reading comprehension measure. Conclusion: Main findings show that students who read texts in print scored significantly better on the reading comprehension test than students who read the texts digitally. Implications of these findings for policymaking and test development are discussed.
扫二维码下载贴吧客户端
下载贴吧APP
看高清直播、视频！
看高清直播、视频！
贴吧热议榜
- 1高校妇女节爆改男仆日1657260
- 2荣了！天禄1比2不敌NAVI1515453
- 3这个吧在抽电视1463504
- 4死掉的白月光才是好白月光1168776
- 5刺客信条影口碑回暖1158690
- 6卡普空杯日本选手夺冠获百万奖金991325
- 7尹锡悦要翻盘还是二进宫784152
- 8中大吧友水帖被老师挂上PPT579554
- 9考研数学小侯七开撕张宇441945
- 10女朋友是玩咖还要继续谈吗369020
